We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Habit Disruption and Behaviour Spillover. A Study of the English Plastic Bag Charge

On December 11 Elena Sautkina (PhD, Professor, Department of Psychology,Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia) took part in the "Culture matters" research seminar with the report "Habit Disruption and Behaviour Spillover. A Study of the English Plastic Bag Charge".

Plastic bag charges are popular and easy-to-implement policy instruments that can successfully reduce plastic bag use, a common waste-related habit, and a cause of environmental pollution. Based on the behaviour spillover theory (Thøgersen, 2012), it can be expected that benefits of bag charges may go even further, in that changes to this behaviour may lead to changes in other environmental behaviours and attitudes. This paper examines habit disruption (Verplanken et al., 2008) and behavior spillover effects of the mandatory plastic bag charge, introduced in England in October 2015. Combining a longitudinal survey from representative samples (n=1,230), observations of customers’ bag use in major supermarkets (n=3,762), and longitudinal in-depth interviews (n=43), we investigated behavioural and attitudinal responses to the charge. Results were triangulated and validated using these different methodologies. Results of surveys, observations and interviews show that the charge was efficient in disrupting the automaticity of plastic bag use habit, and acted as an important ‘thought-trigger’. Changes in plastic bag use, however, did not predict changes in other environmental behaviors, meaning that no behavior spillover effect was found. In addition, results of surveys and interviews indicated the increase in support for the bag charge after its introduction. Increased support for the bag charge, in turn, predicted greater support for other charges to reduce plastic waste, suggesting a ‘policy spillover’ effect. These findings can be used to develop other behavior change policies and interventions in the environmental area, as well as contribute to current debates on behavior and attitude spillover effects. This research was funded by ESRC grant ES/M00385X/1.